Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. Upwell structures should consume "base" amounts of fuel - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Tegho wrote: Why not isk and fuel? Also, hi sec POSes require charters; why do citadels not? because they already use fuel? no need to make them use more. and charters are just a ****** way of making you pay some isk for the high sec usage...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2017.06.17 17:21:05
|
2. Upwell structures should consume "base" amounts of fuel - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Should the structures consume a base amount of fuel? No, no they should not. They should however require an isk fee for operating. With the removal of poses approaching, the cost of fuel itself should actually remain about the same. Think about i...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2017.06.17 16:26:35
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Building Dreams: Introducing Engineering Complexes - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
so... i'm curious as to why / how the decision was made to double nerf the defenses of engineering complexes? i mean, i'm perfectly ok with lower hp and dmg output and all that, and i'm ok with increased vulnerability windows, but why on earth do ...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.10.10 23:07:43
|
4. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: OK, I'll try to keep this to the point and short As far as training goes; Slowcats were bad, new carriers (released 1 month before being nerfed) had an opportunity to change how the class was used by moving away from the N+1...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.07.09 15:19:02
|
5. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: it's still more **** added to the pile without any notification, and it's honestly ridiculous how much it has happened with these latest patches. .... It's really not. It's a minor chang...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.07.05 18:40:14
|
6. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: Miss 'Assassination' Cayman wrote: Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: haven't had a chance to test a carrier since the changes, can anyone confirm that fighter control range is nerfed? The...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.07.05 17:45:08
|
7. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Miss 'Assassination' Cayman wrote: Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: haven't had a chance to test a carrier since the changes, can anyone confirm that fighter control range is nerfed? The control range is still as far as you can lock. The fighte...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.07.05 06:45:51
|
8. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
haven't had a chance to test a carrier since the changes, can anyone confirm that fighter control range is nerfed?
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.07.04 22:09:54
|
9. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
when patch went live i wasn't able to try out the "new features" like the dock and ship swap animations. now that school is over i have been able to try them for myself. you ask for constructive feedback instead of just blanket "remove it" state...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.29 20:33:45
|
10. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: Cheradenine-Zakalwe Amtiskaw wrote: And we're basically back to where we started in real terms. http://evf-eve.com/services/brcat/?s=3954&b=7096434&e=121&t=bb Our roamin...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.29 20:19:02
|
11. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cheradenine-Zakalwe Amtiskaw wrote: And we're basically back to where we started in real terms. http://evf-eve.com/services/brcat/?s=3954&b=7096434&e=121&t=bb Our roaming gang got blobbed by Svipuls, everything died except for ...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.29 20:14:38
|
12. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: 7 pages in 12 hours and much of it requesting ONE (docking animations - ON / OFF) thing be altered. I wonder if CCP is listening? unless they make a DRASTIC change compared to the last month, probably not.
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.29 00:16:42
|
13. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
why am i not surprised that this patch is nothing but a clusterfrak? adding **** that folks didn't ask for and not giving the option to not see it, pushing blanket nerfs to ships that essentially make them useless hanger toys again... you guys don...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.28 17:54:31
|
14. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Vic Jefferson wrote: Cade Windstalker wrote: Dreads are designed, specifically, to kill Caps. If you bring Carriers with no FAXes and the other guys bring Dreads then it makes perfect sense for them to die. Why is this an issue? It's not....
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.27 18:27:31
|
15. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Where you're talking about Battleships sitting isn't significantly different from where Carriers are going to be sitting after these changes. Battleships, even with good fittings, are never going to be terribly good agai...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.26 19:00:13
|
16. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Quote: Cost does not equate to more damage or more applied damage to smaller targets, nor should it. A Battleship is much much more expensive than a Frigate but applies a tiny amount of DPS to one without support or at least EWar. A Titan is do...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.26 17:01:26
|
17. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: C-137 wrote: You seriously want a PVE carrier to do more than 600 dps to a speed tanked cruiser? wow I don't even... yes, a carrier setup for ratting, eg hitting everything from battl...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.26 16:19:14
|
18. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
C-137 wrote: Morgaine Mighthammer wrote: C-137 wrote: You seriously want a PVE carrier to do more than 600 dps to a speed tanked cruiser? wow I don't even... yes, a carrier setup for ratting, eg hitting everything from battleships thro...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.26 15:57:01
|
19. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
C-137 wrote: You seriously want a PVE carrier to do more than 600 dps to a speed tanked cruiser? wow I don't even... yes, a carrier setup for ratting, eg hitting everything from battleships through frigates, should EASILY surpass 600dps on a...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.26 15:43:18
|
20. Sticky:[118.6] Capital Balancing - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
elitatwo wrote: Cade Windstalker wrote: ... Given the current state of the changes I wouldn't worry about Light Fighters being a solo I-Win button. If you get nuked by a single carrier's fighters, in a decently tanked Cruiser, it will be bec...
- by Morgaine Mighthammer - at 2016.06.25 06:19:34
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |